Differential responses of rumen and fecal fermentation and microbiota of Liaoning cashmere goats after 2-hydroxy-4-(methylthio) butanoic acid isopropyl ester supplementation

The 2-hydroxy-4-(methylthio) butanoic acid isopropyl ester (HMBi), a rumen protective methionine, has been extensively studied in dairy cows and beef cattle and has been shown to regulate gastrointestinal microbiota and improve production performance. However, knowledge of the application of HMBi on cashmere goats and the simultaneous study of rumen and hindgut microbiota is still limited. In this study, HMBi supplementation increased the concentration of total serum protein, the production of microbial protein in the rumen and feces, as well as butyrate production in the feces. The results of PCoA and PERMANOVA showed no significant difference between the rumen microbiota, but there was a dramatic difference between the fecal microbiota of the two groups of Cashmere goats after the HMBi supplementation. Specifically, in the rumen, HMBi significantly increased the relative abundance of some fiber-degrading bacteria (such as Fibrobacter) compared with the CON group. In the feces, as well as a similar effect as in the rumen (increasing the relative abundance of some fiber-degrading bacteria, such as Lachnospiraceae FCS020 group and ASV32), HMBi diets also increased the proliferation of butyrate-producing bacteria (including Oscillospiraceae UCG-005 and Christensenellaceae R-7 group). Overall, these results demonstrated that HMBi could regulate the rumen and fecal microbial composition of Liaoning cashmere goats and benefit the host.

www.nature.com/scientificreports/metabolized into 2-hydroxy-4-(methylthio) butyric acid (HMB) and isopropyl ester 8 .The HMB is then transported through circulation to the liver and other organs, while the unabsorbed portion enters the small intestine and is passively diffused via the intestinal mucosa.In the liver and kidneys, HMB is converted to Met by D-2-hydroxy acid dehydrogenase, which is present in all tissue cells throughout the organism 9 .However, studies on HMBi have primarily focused on its effects on specific performance aspects in dairy cows, including milk yield and nitrogen metabolism.Relatively limited research has been conducted on Liaoning cashmere goats, specifically on the effects of HMBi on the hindgut 10 .
The degradation of nutrients by the gastrointestinal microbiota is pivotal in ruminants and determines their ability to utilize substances that are not available to monogastric animals 11 .Given this importance, and the ability of ruminants to break down complex nutrients, it is necessary to examine the effects of HMBi on the rumen and hindgut of ruminants to further our understanding of its impact on growth performance and other related aspects.Therefore, we hypothesize that HMBi supplementation may alter the composition of gastrointestinal microbiota, and the rumen and hindgut microbiota may respond differently to HMBi supplementation.Based on the above hypothesis, we conducted this study to explore the effects of HMBi on the serum biochemical parameters, rumen and fecal fermentation, and composition of microbiota in Liaoning cashmere goats to provide valuable knowledge about and better understand the benefits of HMBi in ruminants.

Growth performance and serum biochemical indicators
There were no significant differences (P > 0.05) observed in BW and ADG between the CON group and HMBi group, while there is a reduced trend (P = 0.060) of F/G ratio in the HMBi group compared with the CON group (Table S2).
Compared with the CON group, the concentration of total serum protein was significantly increased (P = 0.026) in the HMBi group.However, no significant differences (P > 0.05) were observed between these two groups in terms of glucose, triglyceride, albumin, globulin, or urea nitrogen (Table S3).

Rumen and fecal fermentation parameters
Compared with the CON group, the concentrations of rumen MCP were significantly increased (P = 0.038) in the HMBi group.However, there were no significant differences (P > 0.05) in rumen pH, acetate, propionate, butyrate, isobutyrate, valerate, isovalerate, or total volatile fatty acids (TVFAs) between the two groups (Table 1).
In feces, compared with the CON diet, the HMBi diet significantly increased the concentrations of butyrate (P = 0.026) and MCP (P = 0.015).However, no significant differences (P > 0.05) were observed between the two groups in terms of pH, acetate, propionate, isobutyrate, valerate, isovalerate, or TVFAs (Table 1).

Microbial richness and diversity in the rumen and feces
For the microbiota in the rumen, α-diversity analysis showed that the Chao1 and Shannon indices were significantly higher (P < 0.05) in the HMBi group than in the CON group, while dietary treatment had no significant (P > 0.05) effect on the Simpson index (Table 2).For the fecal microbiota, as shown in Table 2, the Simpson index in the HMBi group was significantly lower (P < 0.05) than in the CON group, while dietary treatment had no significant (P > 0.05) effects on the Chao1 or Shannon indices.At the phylum level, statistical analysis showed (Fig. 2a) that there were only minor differences in the ruminal microbiota following dietary treatment.The HMBi supplementation significantly increased (P < 0.05) the relative abundance of Fibrobacterota, Elusimicrobiota, and Chloroflexi compared to the CON group, while there was no significant (P > 0.05) effect on the other phyla.At the genus level, only seven genera were significantly affected by diet treatments (Fig. 4a).Compared with the CON group, the HMBi supplementation significantly increased (P < 0.05) the relative abundance of Fibrobacter, Ruminococcaceae_uncultured, Endomicrobium, RF39_norank, [Clostridium] methylpentosum group_norank, and Erysipelotrichaceae_uncultured, while that of Anaerobiospirillum was significantly reduced (P < 0.05), with no significant differences (P > 0.05) in the other genera.

Alterations in the microbial composition of the feces
At the phylum level (Fig. 2c), compared with the CON group, HMBi supplementation significantly increased (P < 0.05) the relative abundance of Firmicutes and Cyanobacteria, while significantly decreased (P < 0.05) the relative abundance of Bacteroidota, Synergistota, Desulfobacterota, Fibrobacterota and Verrucomicrobiota in the feces microbiota.At the genus level (Fig. 4b), compared to the CON group, the HMBi supplementation At the ASV level, the results of LEfSe analysis showed that a total of 58 ASVs were significantly (P < 0.05) affected by the diet, of which 24 and 34 were significantly enriched in the CON and HMBi groups, respectively (Fig. 5b).More specifically, four ASVs belonging to Prevotella, five belonging to UCG-005, two belonging to Bacteroidales RF16 group, ASV29 (G: Rikenellaceae RC9 gut group), ASV42 (G: Selenomonas), ASV56 (F: Lachnospiraceae), and ASV61 (G: Succiniclasticum) were the characteristic microbiota in the feces of the CON group (P < 0.05), while eight ASVs belonging to Prevotella, seven belonging to UCG-005, two belonging to Bacteroidales RF16 group, two belonging to Christensenellaceae R-7 group, and two belonging to Rikenellaceae RC9 gut group featured in the HMBi group (P < 0.05).

Metabolic pathway prediction of rumen and fecal microbiota
Next, we predicted the potential function of the microbiota using PICRUSt.In the rumen, carbohydrate metabolism (average 16.36%), amino acid metabolism (average 14.03%), energy metabolism (average 9.24%), nucleotide metabolism (average 8.13%), and metabolism of cofactors and vitamins (average 7.69%) were the dominant pathways at KEGG level 2 (Fig. 6a).In terms of specific pathway differences between the two groups, the relative abundance of endocrine and metabolic disease was significantly reduced (P = 0.007) in the HMBi group compared to the CON group (Table 3).Among the 205 predicted metabolic pathways, at KEGG level 3, ribosome (average 5.00%), purine metabolism (average 4.31%), pyrimidine metabolism (average 3.82%), ABC transporters (average 3.05%), and amino sugar and nucleotide sugar metabolism (average 2.32%) were the dominant pathways (Fig. 6b).The results of PCoA and PERMANOVA showed no significant differences (PERMANOVA P = 0.72) between the two groups at KEGG level 3 (Fig. 1c), and LEfSe analysis also indicated that no characteristic metabolic pathways were enriched in either group (P > 0.05).
The results of PCoA and PERMANOVA indicated significant differences (PERMANOVA P = 0.01) between the two groups at KEGG level 3 (Fig. 1d).In addition, the LEfSe analysis showed that 33 metabolic pathways were significantly (P < 0.05) impacted.More specifically, 18 pathways, including pyruvate metabolism, cysteine and methionine metabolism, lysine biosynthesis, valine, leucine and isoleucine biosynthesis, and butanoate metabolism, were significantly enriched (P < 0.05) in the HMBi group.The remaining 15 metabolic pathways were significantly enriched (P < 0.05) in the CON group, including the citrate cycle (TCA cycle), oxidative phosphorylation, nitrogen metabolism, lipopolysaccharide biosynthesis and starch and sucrose metabolism (Fig. 7).

Discussion
In this study, the F/G ratio showed a decreasing trend after HMBi supplementation, while there were no significant differences in the BW and ADG between the CON and HMBi groups.The HMBi supplementation increased the amount of Met in the small intestine and balanced the proportion of amino acids, which improved the digestibility and absorption of amino acids and promoted protein synthesis.The increased concentration of total serum protein in this study confirmed this perspective.A previous study reported that no significant difference in BW, ADG, and F/G ratio of finishing beef cattle after feeding HMBi diets for 56 days, but significant differences at 105 days of feeding 6 .Therefore, we speculated that the results of this study were related to the shorter feeding cycle.The changes in the F/G ratio indicated that the HMBi supplementation may have a positive effect on growth performance.Serum biochemical parameters are comprehensive indicators of the body's metabolism and health status.In this study, the dietary supplementation of HMBi significantly increased the concentration of total serum protein in Liaoning cashmere goats.Consistent with our results, the Han et al. (2017) found that an HMBi supplementation dose of 15 g/d to the diet of Holstein cows significantly increased the concentration of total serum protein 8 .In the present study, the increase in total serum protein in the HMBi group probably reflected an increase in protein synthesis in the goats' lives.However, no significant differences were observed between the two groups in glucose, triglyceride, albumin, globulin, or urea nitrogen.Overall, the above results indicate that supplementation of HMBi does not cause adverse effects on animal health.
In this study, HMBi supplementation had no significant effect on pH or VFA concentration in the rumen, but MCP concentration increased.Salter et al. (1979) found that Met was the first limited amino acid for rumen bacterial growth and that the provision of Met could enhance the growth and reproduction of rumen microbiota and promote the synthesis of rumen MCP 12 .Consistent with the rumen results, we found that the concentration of fecal MCP increased after HMBi supplementation.In addition, our results demonstrated that butyrate concentration was significantly higher in the HMBi group than in the CON group.Butyrate supplies energy and promotes the health of intestinal cells, hence HMBi supplementation would have a positive effect on hindgut health.
In general, the results of PCoA and PERMANOVA showed no significant difference in the richness and diversity of the ruminal microbiota, but there was a dramatic difference between the fecal microbiota of the two www.nature.com/scientificreports/groups of Cashmere goats after HMBi supplementation.This result was similar to a previous report that found significant differences in the β-diversity of cecum but not ruminal microbial composition after the dietary supplementation with HMBi 6 .Another study demonstrated that approximately 50% of ingested HMBi was degraded to HMB and utilized by microbiota in the rumen to synthesize MCP 13 .These inconsistent microbial changes in the rumen and hindgut may therefore be related to differences in the reached substrates, but the exact mechanism still needs further study.Furthermore, we conducted microbial diversity analysis of the ruminal and fecal microbiota, and our findings show that HMBi increase microbial diversity in both the rumen (increased Chao 1 and Shannon indice) and feces (decreased Simpson index).Numerous studies have confirmed that relatively stable microbial abundance and diversity benefit the gastrointestinal microenvironment and the host's health 14,15 .From this perspective, HMBi supplementation would help maintain the microbial diversity of the digestive tract, which in turn is beneficial to health status.The microbiota of the rumen is extremely sophisticated and closely related to the physiological status and diet structure of the host 16,17 .Consistent with other studies, we found that Bacteroidota and Firmicute were the main dominant bacterial phyla, regardless of dietary treatment 18,19 .These dominant microbiota play a vital role in the degradation of ingested feed, especially basic substances such as proteins, cellulose, and starch, which are the primary energy source for the growth of the host and the microbiota 20,21 .As to specific differences, our results showed that the phylum Fibrobacteres and the genus Fibrobacter and Ruminococcaceae_uncultured were significantly higher in the HMBi group.Fibrobacter and Ruminococcaceae are the major cellulolytic bacteria in the rumen, and they were important in the degradation process of fiber.Similar to our results, Martin et al. (2013)  reported that supplementating the diet of cattle with HMBi significantly increased the ruminal abundance of Fibrobacter succinogenes and Ruminococcus flavefaciens 22 .Additionally, previous studies have also confirmed that Met analogs are able to stimulate carboxymethylcellulase activity and rumen microbiota, including Fibrobacter succinogenes and Ruminococcus flavefaciens, to promote the production of MCP 22,23 .Hence, the increase in the www.nature.com/scientificreports/abundance of these bacteria demonstrated that HMBi stimulated the proliferation of fiber-degrading bacteria, which was part of the reason for the increase in MCP.
In addition to fiber-degrading bacteria, our results showed that two ASVs belonging to Prevotella (ASV47 and ASV105), ASV232 (G: Succinivibrio), ASV297 (G: Anaerobiospirillum), ASV972 (G: Prevotellaceae UCG-001) and ASV1125 (O: Clostridia UCG-014) were enriched in the rumen of the HMBi group.Prevotella, a member of the Prevotellaceae family, is the dominant bacterial genus in the rumen, as shown by the bacterial analysis in the present study.Prevotella species have multiple metabolic functions and are involved in the degradation of various substrates, such as carbohydrates, fibers, and proteins 24,25 .An in vitro study showed that the abundance of Prevotella was significantly higher in the HMBi group than in the control group and that Prevotella was significantly positively correlated with dry matter digestibility, MCP, and fermentation parameters 26 .The genera Succinivibrio and Anaerobiospirillum are both members of the Succinivibrionaceae family, which is a common and important microbiota in the rumen.Previous studies have indicated that Succinivibrionaceae contribute to the degradation of starch, pectin, and dextrin, with fermentation products dominated by acetate and propionate (generating succinate, an intermediate in the production of propionic acid), and promote the formation of MCP 27,28 .In addition, Succinivibrionaceae members were reported to be positively correlated with feed efficiency in dairy cows and goats 29,30 .Overall, the above results suggested that the dietary supplementation of HMBi had a certain impact on the rumen bacteria involved in carbohydrate degradation, as well as affecting the fiber-degrading bacteria.
In addition to the rumen, hindgut fermentation is also very important to the ruminant host.For example, previous studies have shown that caecal fermentation could provide about 12% of the total VFAs of ruminants 31 .We therefore conducted microbial analysis of the feces in the present study.At the phylum level, and similarly to the ruminal microbiota, Firmicutes and Bacteroidota were the dominant phyla in the feces.We also observed an increase in the relative abundance of Firmicutes and a decrease in Bacteroidota in the HMBi group.As previously mentioned, the changes in these two important bacterial phyla indicate that HMBi has a huge impact on fecal microbiota.In addition, we also found a significant decrease in the relative abundance of Fibrobacterota after HMBi supplementation.A possible explanation for this decrease is that HMBi supplementation enhances fiber degradation in the rumen, leading to a decreased amount of fiber substrates reaching the hindgut.Desulfobacterota are sulfate-reducing bacteria whose members are able to reduce sulfate to hydrogen sulfide 32,33 .In this study, the decreased abundance of Desulfobacterota in the HMBi group indicated that the HMBi diet may help maintain host health and benefit the housing environment.At a lower taxonomic level, we observed that the relative abundance of some butyrate-producing bacteria, such as Christensenellaceae R-7 group (including ASV40 and ASV49), Lachnospiraceae (NK4A136 group and FCS020 group), Roseburia, and Alistipes, was significantly higher in the HMBi group compared to the CON group.Except for Alistipes, these all belong to the phylum Firmicutes, which exhibits sugar-degradation activity that results in the production of butyrate, among others.In human intestinal studies, Alistipes has been shown to secrete butyrate 34 .These changes in butyrate-producing bacteria correspond to the significant increase in fecal butyrate concentration after HMBi supplementation in the present study.Numerous studies have confirmed that butyrate plays a vital role in cellular energy supply, immune regulation and inflammation elimination 35,36 .Consequently, these changes in the relative abundance of butyrate-producing bacteria and butyrate concentration may have a positive effect on the hindgut health and performance of goats after HMBi supplementation.
Our results also showed that Prevotella and Butyrivibrio were significantly decreased in the HMBi group compared to the CON group.As previously mentioned, Prevotella members have multiple metabolic functions and are involved in the degradation of many substances.The variation in Prevotella abundance could be substrate-dependent, presumably brought on by a greater rate of degradation and absorption of ingested material by the rumen and small intestine.Nevertheless, the significant reduction in Butyrivibrio, which belongs to the same Firmicutes family and utilizes butyrate as the primary metabolite, in the HMBi group, may be due to the competition for substrates between different genera or species.Because bacterial species rarely work together, competition is the dominant interaction 37 .
Our results showed that the functions of the microbiota in the rumen and feces were the same at KEGG level 2, mainly carbohydrate metabolism, amino acid metabolism, energy metabolism and nucleotide metabolism.These functions ensure the normal growth and proliferation of the microbiota resident in the digestive tract.Statistical and LEfSe analysis of the rumen showed that only one pathway (endocrine and metabolic disease metabolic) was affected by the HMBi diet, indicating that HMBi has a minimal effect on the metabolic pathways of the rumen microbiota, which corresponded with the limited changes observed in the microbiota itself.
Unlike these minimal changes in the rumen, we found dramatic differences in fecal microbial function after HMBi supplementation.Our results indicated that four pathways relating to amino acid metabolism (including cysteine and methionine metabolism, phenylalanine, tyrosine and tryptophan biosynthesis, lysine biosynthesis, and valine, leucine and isoleucine biosynthesis) feature in the HMBi group.HMBi supplementation increased hindgut Met flow, and Met acts as a methyl donor to generate Cys, leading to improved Cys and Met metabolism.Apart from this one, the other amino acid-related pathways significantly affected by the dietary treatment were all synthetic.This change could result in greater MCP synthesis, which was confirmed by the increased MCP concentration in the feces of the goats fed the HMBi diet.Moreover, our results showed that the pathway, butanoate metabolism, was enriched in the HMBi group, and this corresponded to the increased butyrate concentration and abundance of butyrate-producing microbiota in the HMBi group.Our results also showed that the abundance of some catabolic pathways (such as alanine, aspartate and glutamate metabolism, purine metabolism, and nitrogen metabolism) was reduced in the HMBi group, indicating that more nitrogen sources are utilized by the hindgut microbiota to synthesize microbial proteins after HMBi supplementation.Our prediction was supported by a previous study showing that the dietary supplementation of HMBi significantly reduces nitrogen excretion and improves nitrogen utilization in cows 13 .Additionally, our results indicated the lipopolysaccharide (LPS) biosynthesis pathway was relatively attenuated in the HMBi group compared to the CON group.In general, the release of LPS is caused by the massive disintegration of Gram-negative bacteria, and Bacteroidota was the most abundant Gram-negative bacteria found in the animal digestive tract 38 .Consequently, the decrease in the abundance of Bacteroidota and in the LPS biosynthesis pathway in the feces of goats fed the HMBi diet in the present study may lead to a decrease in fecal LPS concentration, and be of benefit to hindgut health.
In conclusion, our study found differences in serum biochemical indicators, rumen and fecal fermentation, and microbiota responses to an HMBi diet in Liaoning cashmere goats.Our results suggested that host protein nutrition was improved, and that rumen and fecal fermentation and microbiota changes were partially similar after treatment, but fecal microbial changes were more dramatic.In the rumen, HMBi supplementation increased some fiber-degrading bacteria (such as Fibrobacter and ASV232).In the feces, as well as a similar effect as in the rumen (increasing some fiber-degrading bacteria, such as Lachnospiraceae FCS020 group, ASV9, and ASV32), an HMBi diet also increased the proliferation of butyrate-producing bacteria (including Oscillospiraceae UCG-005, Christensenellaceae R-7 group, ASV40, and ASV49).Overall, these findings suggested that HMBi supplementation has a certain positive impact on ruminal and fecal fermentation and on microbial composition and function.Further research is needed to understand the specific mechanisms responsible for these changes and to determine their potential implications for animal health and productivity.

Experimental animals and diets
The study is reported following the ARRIVE guidelines (https:// arriv eguid elines.org) and all protocols in this study were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang, China (IACUC No. 2021091501).A total of 16 Liaoning cashmere goats with similarly original ages (8-month-old) and approximate body weight (39.94 ± 0.886 kg) have randomly been allotted to 2 groups (n = 8), which one feed control diet, and another feed experimental diet (basic diets + HMBi, supplied by Adisseo company, with 1.27% DM).The experimental period was 47 days: 7 d for adaptations and 40 d for testing.The comprehensive nutrition and composition of the basic diet are shown in Table S1.
The body weight (BW) of each Liaoning cashmere goat was measured on the first and last day of the experimental period before morning feeding, respectively.The average daily gain (ADG) was calculated as the difference between final BW and initial BW and divided by 40.The feed/gain (F/G) ratio was determined by dividing the www.nature.com/scientificreports/average daily feed intake (the sum of the difference between the daily diet offered to and refused by goats, and then divided by the number of days of the experiments) by ADG.Jugular vein blood was collected in triplicate using EDTA tubes (5 ml) before the morning feeding on day 37 of the formal experimental period.Samples were centrifuged at 3500 × g for 15 min, and the serum was collected and stored at − 80 °C for subsequent processing.
After the first feeding on day 40 of the formal experimental period (waiting for 4-5 h), the rumen content and feces were collected.Homogenization of the rumen content and feces was performed, and respective portions were gathered into sterile centrifuge tubes and immediately put aside a − 80 °C for subsequent DNA extraction.

DNA extraction
The frozen samples were fully thawed, mixed well, and 0.3 g samples were taken for DNA extraction.DNA purification was performed using the QIAamp DNA stool Mini Kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany).Subsequently, the concentration and purity of the DNA were assessed using a NanoDrop spectrophotometer (Nyxor Biotech, Paris, France) to ensure it met the required standards.The DNA samples were then amplified by PCR and subjected to 16 s rRNA high throughput sequencing.
Sequencing was conducted on the Illumina MiSeq platform, and the obtained sequencing reads utilized the FLASH (version 1.2.7) and the QIIME (version 1.8.0) to consolidate the pair reads and analyze the data 40,41 The high-quality reads were selected according to the criteria listed below: (a) minimum sequence length of 200 bp; (b) do not contain equivocal "N" bases; (c) average base quality score is not less than 25 42 .The duplicates in sequences that meet the criteria are removed, and the DADA2 algorithm (QIIME 2) was conducted to identify indel-mutations and substitutions 43 .The paired reads were trimmed and filtered, and no more than two expected errors per read (maxEE = 2).Paired reads were merged and chimera filtered.The RDP Classifier (http:// rdp.cme.msu.edu/) analyzes the phylogenetic affiliation of each 16S rRNA gene sequence (herein called ASVs) through the silva (SSU132)16S rRNA database with a confidence threshold of 70% 44 .Rarefaction curves and diversity parameters (Chao1, Shannon, and Simpson) were used to assess sequencing depth and microbial structure (richness and diversity), respectively 45 , and the potential metabolic functions were prognosticated using PICRUSt (http:// picru st.github.io/ picru st/).Functional classification was performed using the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) database.

Statistical analysis
All statistical analysis were conducted using SPSS 23.0 (SPSS v. 20.0, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, United States).The data on fermentation parameters and serum biochemical parameters between two groups were analyzed using independent sample t-test, and the microbial data (such as microbial phylum, genus and functions) that identified as non-parametric data were analyzed using Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney U test.The Bray-Curtis distance based principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) and the permutation multivariate analysis (PERMANOVA) were applied to evaluate whether the discrepant difference occurred in the microbial richness between groups.The linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe) was employed to identify ASVs and metabolic pathways (at KEGG level 3) that were significantly enriched in two groups.The P < 0.05 was deemed to be the criterion for significant divergence.The heatmap plot was generated using R software (v.4.2.2) package "pheatmap" (v.1.0.12) 46 through Hiplot Pro (https:// hiplot.com.cn/), a comprehensive web service for biomedical data analysis and visualization.

Figure 1 .Figure 2 .
Figure 1.The principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) score plots of the microbial samples from the rumen (a) and feces (b) and PCoA score plots of the metabolic pathways (KEGG level 3) from the rumen (c) and fecal (d) microbiota, based on the Bray-Curtis similarity metric.CON, the control group; HMBi, the 2-hydroxy-4-(methylthio) butanoic acid isopropyl ester supplementation group.

Figure 3 .
Figure 3.The microbial structure of the rumen (a) and feces (b) in Liaoning cashmere goat fed CON and HMBi diets at the ASV level.CON, the control group; HMBi, the 2-hydroxy-4-(methylthio) butanoic acid isopropyl ester supplementation group.

Figure 5 .
Figure 5. Linear discriminant analysis (LDA) scores of the microbial ASVs in the rumen (a) and feces (b) of Liaoning cashmere goat fed the CON and HMBi diets.CON, the control group; HMBi, the 2-hydroxy-4-(methylthio) butanoic acid isopropyl ester supplementation group.

Figure 6 .
Figure 6.The predominant metabolic functions of rumen and fecal microbiota in Liaoning cashmere goat fed the CON and HMBi diets at different KEGG levels.The metabolic functions of the rumen microbiota at KEGG level 2 (a) and 3 (b).The metabolic functions of the fecal microbiota at KEGG level 2 (c) and 3 (d).CON, the control group; HMBi, the 2-hydroxy-4-(methylthio) butanoic acid isopropyl ester supplementation group.

Figure 7 .
Figure 7. Linear discriminant analysis (LDA) scores of the microbial metabolic functions (KEGG level 3) in the feces of Liaoning cashmere goat fed the CON and HMBi diets.CON, the control group; HMBi, the 2-hydroxy-4-(methylthio) butanoic acid isopropyl ester supplementation group.

Table 3 .
The alterations in the metabolic functions of rumen and fecal microbiota at KEGG level 2 in Liaoning cashmere goat fed the control (CON) and 2-hydroxy-4-(methylthio) butanoic acid isopropyl ester (HMBi) diets.